without a single loss of U.S. troops

[New10.]

without a single loss of U.S. troops

By New10.



There is something vulgar about the war on Iraq. No rational mind would
instigate such a war. There are many cruel rulers in power all over the
world are we going to send our young men to die in countries they never
heard of ?

With a 60 million (or more) dollars of bounty on the heads of
these rulers in time they will be killed by their own people, without a
single loss of U.S. troops.

[s***@yahoo.com]

Post by New10.
without a single loss of U.S. troops
By New10.
There is something vulgar about the war on Iraq. No rational mind would
instigate such a war. There are many cruel rulers in power all over the
world are we going to send our young men to die in countries they never
heard of ?
With a 60 million (or more) dollars of bounty on the heads of
these rulers in time they will be killed by their own people, without a
single loss of U.S. troops.

...but then George W. Jr's investments in US weapons manufacturers
might fall like the rest of the US economy under his reign. Also, his
oil reserves wouldn't get such a high profit. Of course his
$500,000,000,000+ trip to Mars will cause an even greater need for
oil, so his Texan oil rigs and the exported oil from Iraq will be
needed even more. If Bush invested elsewhere, then perhaps he'd
understand your plan.

[R***@kc.rr.com]

I suspect everyone's heard of Afghanistan and Iraq by now...your theory has
a gaping flaw son...

Post by New10.
without a single loss of U.S. troops
By New10.
There is something vulgar about the war on Iraq. No rational mind would
instigate such a war. There are many cruel rulers in power all over the
world are we going to send our young men to die in countries they never
heard of ?
With a 60 million (or more) dollars of bounty on the heads of
these rulers in time they will be killed by their own people, without a
single loss of U.S. troops.